Find Me
Disclaimer

This site, roganhamby.com is maintained and updated by myself on personal time and is a reflection of my personal interests in libraries and technology.  In no way does any content on here reflect a position of the State Library of South Carolina, SC LENDS or any organizations associated with either.

Tuesday
May012012

New CiL Article Referencing Evergreen

The new issue of Computers in Libraries (May 2012) features articles about curation and collections.  My own article about de-duplication 10% Wrong for 90% Done: A Practical Approach to Collection Deduping approaching bibliographic was not only selected as a feature but their freebie available directly on the web.  So be enticed, buy the magazine.  Actually, I have a fairly high opinion of Computers in Library compared to the other outlets that dicuss library technologies.

Anyway, in it I discuss the approach we within SCLENDS choose to handle bib dedupping and build a solution that was economically feasible, was positive customer experience centric and could be implemented fairly quickly.  As an Evergreen consortium already live timeliness was important to us.

Although I didn't post about it at the time, I should mention that since the article mentions me at the South Carolina State Library I have now actually moved to York County as their Manager of the Headquarters Library and Reference Services.  It is nice to be back in thick of public service including children's and outreach which I've dealt with less since I worked more with reference and circulation staff at the State Library (though those are among my departments now too).  I am still working with SC LENDS though and have been retained to continue my project management duties there.

 

Sunday
Apr292012

A Tale of Two Presentations

As I write this I’m guessing that the last stragglers of the morning after the conference are winding out of the Hyatt and away from Indianapolis.  Another Evergreen International Conference is in the can and cleaned up.  The folks from Evergreen Indiana did a wonderful job.  And I want to thank Shauna for the great job she did coordinating and all of the other great staff whose names I don’t know off hand.  

I and two others were elected to the Evergreen Oversight Board for the next three years.  We made absolutely no campaign promises so we’re already doing better than most political bodies.  None of the elections were unanimous which is good but I wish there had been more candidates and more contention.  It might sound odd for someone who wins an election to be wistful for more people not wanting to elect him but an engaged community will have opinions and disagreement.  Uniformity of opinion is often a disguise for apathy.  However, I am excited to be elected and think we have a lot of good to do in the next few years, much of which was discussed at the community meeting and more will come.

However, what I’m thinking about right now, among the many take aways I’ve had from the conference, has to do with two of the conference sessions I was involved with and thinking forward to next year.  

One presentation, that I did on Friday, was a panel discussion and Q&A entitled “There and Back Again: A Journey in Handling Evergreen’s Network Needs.”  I did this with Galen from ESI, Genevieve from Bibliomation and Chris from GA PINES.  Despite us having no practice and only a brief review of the slides together it went really well.  Not only did we all have something of value to say (I think) but the moderating and handing off went really well as did the questions.  We ended exactly on time and we had a great time keeper.  That’s a harder job than it looks, really. 

The presentation can be found here : http://www.slideshare.net/roganhamby/there-and-back-again-the-networking-needs-of-evergreen but it basically consists of a few ice breaker slides and prompts for the discussion.  I wish I had been able to record the sessions and have resolved to bring a good microphone in order to do so next year.  By the way, if you want to see the “special” slides you’re out of luck - those have been removed - conference attendees only.  What happens in Indianapolis stays in Indianapolis.   

Now, I want to contrast that experience with Thursday’s “Everything A SysAdmin Needs to Know About Cataloging But Was Afraid to Ask.”  Even going in my co-presenter and I had basically built two presentations - one from the culture of cataloging side and one from the technical details of catalogs side.  Then, we decided to open the door to questions and really push for those from attendees.  And that is where it both went really well and really wrong.  The questions were great.  Engagement was great.  We got a lot of information out to a lot of people.  The bad?  It wasn’t the people we intended to be our audience or the information we wanted to provide.  We were hijacked by really nice people with really valid questions though it wasn’t where I imagined the questions being asked.

Essentially, we had a lot of catalogers attend who needed to ask questions about cataloging - a little bit about work flows, a little bit about where functionality is and a lot about where functionality is going.  I’m glad to have a forum for that discussion but it’s not what that forum was intended to be.  So, I’m resolving that next year that I’m going to try to give this another go as the feedback indicated to me that the topic does need to be done and from the IT folks that talked to me afterwards I learned even more about how to gear this discussion.  However, we also must have the cataloging forum that it obviously became and I’m convinced that the same format that we used for the networking panel would be perfect.  

So, I’m committing to trying to get two presentations onto the schedule next year.  One, I will present, maybe with someone else, and it will be version 2.0 of the cataloging / Evergreen for IT folks presentation and I will be party to it.  The second, I simply want to bully the right folks into doing but I probably won’t be a member of and that is The State of Cataloging and Acquisitions in Evergreen.  I have already gotten a commitment from one technical services and acquisitions person and I’m hoping to get similar commitments from one or two others and one developer.  

So, already thinking about 2013 in Vancouver.   See you there.

 

Monday
Apr162012

Evergreen 2.2 Features

As we start looking from 2.1 to 2.2 I'm interested in looking at the new features.  ESI has been great about having Sally Fortin document new changes but I suspect these are primarily the result of ESI's specific contracted work.  There are a lot more changes however from bug fixes, to under the hood improvements to major changes not from any specific contracted source.  

So, this PowerPoint is a result of taking the work Sally has done and simplifying the documentation.  Sally documented the configuration and uses of the new features while most of these slides only cover what the new features are.  

Evergreen 2.2 New Features as PowerPoint

Evergreen 2.2 New Features as PDF

Thursday
Sep152011

A Practical Approach to Bibliographic De-duplication

De-Duplication Project

[ This is a duplicate of what I posted on sclends.net/projects/ ]

Early in the days of SC LENDS we faced the challenge of strict bibliographic de-duplication methods leaving our catalog messy for both staff and public. The issue wasn’t aesthetic but affected the services and workflow we offer. Unwilling to accept the common wisdom that we had to live with it we developed our own solution. The documents below give our history with the project and the code developed for it.

This is the presentation done at the Evergreen International Conference on the project and is the story of the project:

10% Wrong, 90% Done: A Practical Approach to Bibliographic De-duplication
http://sclends.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/10PercentWrong.pdf

This PDF describes the technical aspects of the project:

Bibliographic De-duplication Based on Narrow Data Element Matches Between Records
http://sclends.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/SC_LENDS_De-duplication.pdf

This is the actual SQL code developed by Equinox for us:

http://sclends.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/sclends_dedupe.txt

10% Wrong 90% Done: A Practical Approach to Bibliographic De-duplication and Bibliographic De-duplication Based on Narrow Data Element Matches Between Records are both licensed by Rogan Hamby and Shasta Brewer under:

Creative Commons LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Tuesday
Aug162011

Open Source Reality Check

Library Journal just published an article they interviewed me for entitled Open Source Reality Check.  

http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/home/891350-264/open_source_reality_check.html.csp

Over all, I thought it was one of the more balanced and fair articles looking at open source from a high level perspective that I've read in main stream library journals.  Open source isn't perfect, it's a human endeavor after all but it is a proven model though indivdiual projects can fail.  The article spends a lot of time looking at KCLS, which is to be expected.  The bit they quoted from me was me discussing, and dismissing, the idea that open source is somehow magically less stable than commercial software.  The factors that make an open source project stable have to do with scale, which is also true of commercial software - it is the metrics that vary.  

Oh, and they got my place of employment wrong.  I was at the time of my LJ Movers and Shakes award with the Florence County Library System but I'm now the Director of IT and Innovation for the State Library in SC.